Mr.Key Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Nevaru saprast, kuru labāk lietot - strict vai transitional. Parasti lietoju transitional, bet kādi ieguvumi (un zaudējumi) būtu no strict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilots Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Angliski par šo tematu var diezgan dažādus rakstus palasīt. Es pats pieturos pie XHTML 1.0 Strict, vienīgi jāpiebilst, ka ir problemātiski uzrakstīt valīdu kodu, kurā būtu video embedots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Key Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 man patīk, kā valīdojas google un citi top saiti... jautajums nav aktuaals, par validatoru izvelos browseri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mefisto Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Strict. Un patiesība daudzi gudri cilvēki iesaka lietot HTML 4.0 nevis XHTML 1.0, bet tas atkarīgs no mērķa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilots Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Piekrītu, nav redzēts populārs saits ar valīdu kodu. Man gan validēšana palīdz atrast kļūdas, neaizvērti tagi utml. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kavacky Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Var arī izlaist caur validatoru, apskatīties rezultātu un tad novērtēt, kuras ir kļūdas, bet kuras "kļūdas". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts